After Armenia-Azerbaijan Struggle, Trauma, Tragedy and Devastation


For Armenians uprooted from their houses, and for Azerbaijanis returning to uninhabitable cities, “It’s going to be very exhausting to forgive.”

Carlotta Gall and

Mauricio Lima and


FIZULI, Azerbaijan — Crossing into territory that Azerbaijan lately recaptured from Armenia is a journey right into a devastated wasteland paying homage to a World Struggle I battlefield. The highway passes miles of deserted trenches and bunkers, and village after village of ruins, the white stones of homesteads scattered, each movable merchandise — roofs, doorways, window frames — picked clear.

The absence of life is eerie.

Wrecked Armenian tanks and armor lay beside the highway and in hilltop positions, testomony to the devastating energy of Azerbaijani drones. Deserted uniforms and gear sign a panicked retreat by Armenian troopers as Azerbaijani forces seized management of the district in early November.

A long time after the encircling territory was seized by Armenia, the city of Fizuli, as soon as a affluent agricultural settlement of some 30,000 individuals, has grow to be a forest, its ruined public buildings smothered by bushes and undergrowth. The destiny of the bigger city of Aghdam, additional north, is much more stark, its buildings break up open to the skies on a desiccated plain, its foremost bridge destroyed.

“It’s going to be very exhausting for me to forgive them,” Elmaddin Safarov, 47, a military veteran, stated of the Armenians, as he gazed on the wreckage of Aghdam, the place 17 of his kin died.

The battle over Nagorno-Karabakh, an ethnically Armenian enclave inside Azerbaijan, has been one of many world’s most intractable territorial disputes. A six-year conflict led to 1994 with Armenia claiming not simply Nagorno-Karabakh but in addition nice swathes of surrounding territory, and driving greater than 800,000 Azerbaijanis into exile.

Azerbaijan regained management of Fizuli and Aghdam, a part of the territory that Armenia had managed, after six weeks of a blistering military offensive that ended with a Russian-brokered truce. Many of the core of Nagorno-Karabakh stays in Armenian fingers, patrolled by Russian peacekeepers.

The conflict’s violence — essentially the most intense battle in Europe or its periphery this century — has layered fresh trauma and tragedy on high of many years of devastation.

For Armenians, it’s households uprooted, a homeland misplaced, hundreds of troopers killed whereas defending in opposition to a fearsome 21st-century conflict machine. For Azerbaijanis, it’s the legacy of a quarter-century of expulsion from their Soviet-era homes, from territory that’s now recaptured however that won’t grow to be liveable for years.

And whereas the conflict could also be over, a repository of hatred, strengthened by experiences of atrocities by both sides, together with movies of executions and beheadings of prisoners, guarantees to linger for generations to come back.

Simply days earlier than, as Mr. Safarov was taking in his homeland’s devastation, a cold mountain fog was creeping by the bushes and filling each crevice of a navy camp hidden off a village highway on the opposite facet of the entrance line, to the north. There, Armenian volunteer troopers, some of their 60s, in sundry sneakers and hats, their faces clean and weathered, listened to their commander in silence and disappointment.

The commander, retired Col. Artur Aleksanyan, 63, was telling them that it was time to go residence.

“All the things is barely starting,” he pledged in a comfortable voice. “I’m positive we are going to return to our lands.”

Colonel Aleksanyan’s males, requested in regards to the conflict, fastened on the horrors of Azerbaijan’s “suicide drones” that hovered over the battlefield, ready for a goal. The ordnance was so exact that Armenian troopers working battle tanks would drive onto the battlefield, hearth off a spherical and bounce out and run for canopy, the troopers stated.

“It was hell,” one man saved repeating.

Reviewing his troops’ positions on the entrance, the place the heavy weaponry had simply been withdrawn, Colonel Aleksanyan picked his approach by the dense, sticky mud previous unexploded cluster bombs with their telltale crimson ribbons. The hillside was pockmarked with blast craters, a few of them full of twisted steel, moldy bread and human excrement. Alongside the ridgeline, the troops had dug trenches, a couple of ft deep and barely vast sufficient for one man to sleep in whereas a comrade manned the machine gun above him.

Colonel Aleksanyan was nonetheless coping with the abdomen harm he had sustained within the final conflict, within the 1990s, and the catheter tube snaking out of his uniform as he trudged up the battlefield was a reminder of that battle’s unhealed wounds. He identified the valley under the place, this fall, Azerbaijan had despatched waves of infantry; his unit held their floor, and the scores of lifeless lay there for weeks, the stench drifting as much as the trenches, till after the conflict’s finish.

“We have to analyze our errors and after this, we are going to return,” Colonel Aleksanyan informed his troops. “All of the Armenians of all of the world stand behind us.”

Armenians imagine that the Soviet Union’s early choice to make Nagorno-Karabakh a part of Azerbaijan is a historic improper.

Colonel Aleksanyan was on the victorious facet within the 1990s, when Armenia captured not solely Nagorno-Karabakh correct but in addition surrounding territory inhabited by a whole lot of hundreds of Azerbaijanis.

To Armenia, occupying a lot Azerbaijani territory was essential to guarantee Nagorno-Karabakh’s safety. To Azerbaijanis, it was an injustice that they have been decided to reverse.

Now, regardless of its celebration of victory, Azerbaijan has recovered a largely desolate and destroyed area.

“It seems to be like a hell,” stated Umud Mirzayev, head of an Azerbaijani information company, whose personal village was amongst these ruined. “It was once so inexperienced; it’s a spot that was well-known for farming, for grapes, cotton and sheep.”

Two former school classmates, returning to the city of Fizuli for the primary time since fleeing the conflict 27 years earlier, struggled to search out their approach by ruins smothered in brambles and sprouting bushes.

“It was inconceivable to cross alongside the roads as a result of they’re filled with bushes and undergrowth,” stated one in all them, Atakshi Babayev.

His companion, Nureddin Namazaliyev noticed the imposing czarist portico of the regional newspaper constructing, one of many few monuments nonetheless recognizable, and immediately knew his approach residence. His father had labored as editor in chief of the newspaper, Araz, for 50 years, and he had usually walked with him to work.

However when he reached their outdated residence, nothing remained.

“I couldn’t discover even a small piece of my home, not a bit of glass, not a single nail,” he stated. He took as an alternative some soil from the yard and introduced it again to sprinkle on the graves of his dad and mom of their ancestral village. “That was a really huge factor for me as a result of they may not return,” he stated.

Mr. Namazaliyev recalled that his cousin, who was held by Armenian forces as a prisoner of conflict, was compelled to work dismantling homes in Aghdam. The stone, well-known for its golden colour, was bought, he stated.

Vagif Hasanov, 61, the mayor of Aghdam, was blunt in his view of why Armenian forces destroyed the town. The swish 19th-century central mosque is the one constructing left standing in Aghdam. Defiled by Armenian graffiti, it was used as a cowshed.

“They wished to harm Turks and Muslims,” Mr. Hasanov stated. Would he ponder Armenians returning to reside within the metropolis? He answered with a curt “No.”

It was the purposeful destruction of the town and its heritage that upset Mr. Namazaliyev essentially the most. The newspaper and its printing presses have been gone, the cinema and the cultural middle had vanished, and the central Allakbar mosque had been diminished to rubble. The wonderful vineyards had been uprooted and turned to mud.

“They even broken the soil of Fizuli,” Mr. Namazaliyev stated.

Azerbaijan’s officers have pledged to supply reconciliation and equal standing to Armenians residing on its territory, however few can see it working in apply.

Armenians imagine they’re focused by Azerbaijanis as a result of Armenians are Christian, they usually worry Azerbaijan’s more and more shut alliance with Turkey, which continues to deny the Armenian Genocide that began in 1915.

“There isn’t any motive for Armenians to need to reside below Azerbaijani rule,” stated Gerard Libaridian, a former adviser to Armenia’s first president and a retired professor of Armenian historical past on the College of Michigan. “It will be a domination. It will not be a governance.”

Many Armenians say they are going to maintain preventing for Nagorno-Karabakh to be acknowledged as an unbiased nation, regardless of a global consensus that the territory is a part of Azerbaijan.

“How can we speak about justice?” stated Garik Melkonyan, the director of the Armenian newspaper Aravot and a member of Colonel Aleksanyan’s unit of volunteer troopers, rejecting the concept of reconciliation with Azerbaijan. “Historical past reveals that they will’t give us something.”

Some Armenians now acknowledge that alternatives for an enduring peace have been misplaced over many years of halting and unproductive peace talks.

Mediators tried to at the least enable Azerbaijanis to return and resettle a few of the outlying districts similar to Aghdam and Fizuli. However for years Armenia held on to them, seeing them as a bargaining chip for independence or secession for Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijan’s leaders thought-about, however in the long run by no means might agree, to letting go of Nagorno-Karabakh.

The impasse was difficult by Armenian politicians and activists world wide more and more taking the place — disputed by Azerbaijanis — that all the captured lands have been rightfully Armenian. And when Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan traveled to Nagorno-Karabakh — identified in Armenia as Artsakh — in August 2019 and declared that “Artsakh is Armenia,” he despatched the unmistakable message that the maximalist strategy had gained out.

For years, foundations funded by members of the Armenian diaspora have pushed for Armenian settlement of the occupied areas of Azerbaijan outdoors the core of Nagorno-Karabakh, arguing that also they are Armenia’s rightful lands.

“Now we have lived on this place for five,000 years and we’re solely leaving it quickly,” stated the primate of the Armenian Church in Britain, Bishop Hovakim Manukian, in a goodbye sermon on the church within the village of Hak, or Minkend in Azerbaijani. “Now we have to come back again. Now we have to come back again and take over our land.”

A plaque within the church described centuries of pillaging and massacres by Turks and Kurds that worn out the Armenian inhabitants of the realm. The renovation of the church was financed by Virginia Davies, a lawyer in New York, in reminiscence of her grandmother, a survivor of the Armenian genocide.

“For me and for all Armenians worldwide — and we’re united — we can not imagine what has simply occurred to us,” Ms. Davies stated in her farewell deal with on the church final month. “We won’t cede our historic lands.”

However there was little point out of the ruins throughout the village and the stays of homes dotting the hillside for miles alongside the highway. Azerbaijanis’ need to return to their houses right here — even when it meant conflict — has lengthy been a driving drive of their nation’s politics.

Now it’s these ruins, seen throughout Nagorno-Karabakh and the territories managed till lately by Armenia, which will feed a brand new wave of Azerbaijani anger at their neighbors because the injury and neglect of the final quarter-century comes into view.

Many Azerbaijanis say they’re prepared to just accept Armenians remaining in Nagorno-Karabakh and even for Russian peacekeepers to guard them. However they insist on their territorial sovereignty and need to see a change within the basic Armenian stance.

“Why ought to we combat, take weapons and kill one another?” Teymur Haciyev, who was displaced from his residence within the metropolis of Shusha on the age of 9, stated of the Armenians. “We actually want this was a superb lesson for them. Possibly they are going to neglect their desires.”



Source link

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *