Democratic Information Community: CNN Helps Yang Bash Trump, Push Leftist Economics


On Wednesday’s New Day, CNN co-hosts John Berman and Alisyn Camerota introduced on former Democratic presidential candidate and CNN political commentator Andrew Yang to bash President Trump and marketing campaign for Joe Biden — although viewers may have simply mistaken all three of them for washed-up Democratic politicians. Spurred on by his media allies, Yang celebrated Biden’s lead within the polls and launched a partisan assault on the Republican plan for the brand new coronavirus stimulus bundle.

Camerota started with self-righteous pearl clutching over Trump’s use of the time period “China virus” to discuss with COVID-19: “The President does not discuss with it within the vernacular that most individuals within the nation, docs included, discuss with it COVID-19 or coronavirus. Why do you suppose he’s branding it because the China virus?”

 

 

That is what CNN calls information now? Actually, who cares what Trump calls the virus? CNN hypes how terrible the pandemic is daily, after which spends its time worrying about spinoff issues comparable to this. That is additionally pure hypocrisy from the Democratic hack. CNN used the phrases “China’s coronavirus” and “Wuhan virus” all through February and March.

Yang then proceeded to bash Trump’s response to the virus:

Properly he is hoping he can distract the American public from his administration’s epic mishandling of the coronavirus disaster and the very fact is now a transparent majority of People, together with a rising proportion of Republicans, disapprove of how he is dealt with it. And so he will his playbook and saying, look, if I can distract the American folks and use inflammatory or divisive rhetoric, perhaps they will ignore the truth that now we have sadly now change into the singular instance of a developed nation that’s struggling at increased ranges from the coronavirus than some other nation on the earth.

Berman and Yang continued to deal with Trump’s terminology for the virus:

BERMAN: Yeah, I imply, there have been those that have been saying he modified his tone. Actually did not change his tone on attempting to divide on that kind of language, which there are numerous individuals who have a look at as racist, Andrew.

YANG: Yeah, as an Asian-American who sensed this surge in hostility in opposition to Asian-People, it is actually damaging, it’s damaging, it’s heartbreaking. I’ve buddies who do not wish to exit in public due to the hostility that the President is sadly encouraging.

This was wealthy coming from Yang, who has endorsed Biden. Biden has been infamously insensitive in the direction of Asian-People. Biden has claimed that the one purpose that Japanese ladies are employed is that Japanese males are so xenophobic that they’d relatively have their ladies work than foreigners. He additionally as soon as requested a gaggle of Asian-American ladies if their “husbands such as you working full-time?”

Yang then celebrated Biden’s lead within the polls: “So he is clearly simply attempting to model it a selected approach for his political expedience. I am pleased to say it doesn’t appear to be working in any respect and also you’re seeing now within the ballot numbers — you’re seeing the truth that — that at this level Joe has constructed a double digit lead.”

Camerota urged Yang to dismiss Republican considerations concerning the large authorities spending and allowed to shamelessly foyer for the Democratic stimulus plan:

CAMEROTA: I imply, as you realize, Republicans are actually even inside their very own ranks scuffling with how a lot reduction and stimulus, et cetera, to provide. It goes in opposition to their — you realize, acknowledged philosophy that they’ve thrown out about being, you realize, deficit hawks and all that stuff. And so coming proper up is that $600 supplemental uninsurance cash that individuals have been getting. It may expire this month. And also you hear some Republicans saying that — that they’re — they do not wish to renew it, they’re uncomfortable with it as a result of was extra money than folks have been typically making after they had paychecks. So what is the response to that?

YANG: However economists who’ve checked out it say there are three issues that this invoice needs to be constructed round. Primary is direct money reduction to folks. Quantity two, advantages that assist individuals who do not have a job. So this can be a — a — one purpose why the payroll tax is a horrible thought. And quantity three, direct money to states as a result of proper now, many states across the nation are having big price range brief falls and the very last thing you want are extra layoffs within the midst of this pandemic.

These foolish Republicans, eager to spend much less after passing a invoice that would add practically as a lot as $6 trillion to the national debt.

CNN is now not a information community, it simply spouts propaganda for Democratic insurance policies and candidates.

This DNC-TV was delivered to viewers by Liberty Mutual. Allow them to know here for those who suppose they need to be sponsoring this content material.

Learn the total July 22nd transcript right here:

CNN’s New Day
07/22/20
8:26:32 a.m. Jap

ALISYN CAMEROTA: President Trump took a extra critical tone yesterday concerning the pandemic that’s gripping the U.S. And far of the world. This was through the convention on coronavirus, however the President nonetheless managed to work in his most well-liked identify for it. 

[Cuts to video]

DONALD TRUMP: Right this moment I wish to present an replace on our response to the China virus. The China virus is a vicious and harmful sickness. The median age of those that succumb to the China virus is 78 years outdated. In the event you watch American tv, you’d suppose that the USA was the one nation concerned with and affected by the China virus. 

[Cuts to live]

CAMEROTA: Becoming a member of us now’s CNN political commentator and former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang. Andrew, nice to see you. The President does not discuss with it within the vernacular that most individuals within the nation, docs included, discuss with it COVID-19 or coronavirus. Why do you suppose he’s branding it because the China virus? 

ANDREW YANG: Properly he is hoping he can distract the American public from his administration’s epic mishandling of the coronavirus disaster and the very fact is now a clear majority of People, together with a rising proportion of Republicans, disapprove of how he is dealt with it. And so he will his playbook and saying, look, if I can distract the American folks and use inflammatory or divisive rhetoric, perhaps they will ignore the truth that now we have sadly now change into the singular instance of a developed nation that’s struggling at increased ranges from the coronavirus than some other nation on the earth. 

JOHN BERMAN: Yeah, I imply, there have been those that have been saying he modified his tone. Actually did not change his tone on attempting to divide on that kind of language, which there are numerous individuals who have a look at as racist, Andrew. 

YANG: Yeah, as an Asian-American who sensed this surge in hostility in opposition to Asian-People, it is actually damaging, it’s damaging, it’s heartbreaking. I’ve buddies who do not wish to exit in public due to the hostility that the President is sadly encouraging. 

CAMEROTA: God, that’s — that’s actually heartbreaking to right here Andrew. However you realize, I imply, what his press secretary I believe has mentioned is that they’re simply following within the lengthy line of historical past of naming a virus after, you realize, the place it comes from. We’ve referred to as — we name 1918 the Spanish flu. Ebola is called for a river close to its origin. What’s your response to that? 

YANG: Oh, it — it is factually incorrect. It isn’t just like the Spanish flu even originated in Spain, and any well being skilled will say that we needs to be naming this by its technical identify, COVID-19, or the novel coronavirus. So he is clearly simply attempting to model it a selected approach for his political expedience. I am pleased to say it doesn’t appear to be working in any respect and also you’re seeing now within the ballot numbers — you’re seeing the truth that — that at this level Joe has constructed a double digit lead. 

BERMAN:  I wish to ask you concerning the discussions occurring on Capitol Hill proper now by way of new stimulus getting cash in folks’s pockets. We after all are you asking you since you are maybe the most effective recognized champion of a common fundamental revenue. You wish to give People $1,000 a month throughout the board. There speaking about one thing completely different. One of many issues the President desires is a payroll tax lower. What are the restrictions of that by way of what you want to to see?

YANG: Economists who’ve checked out it are practically unanimous or unanimous in saying a payroll tax lower isn’t the way in which to go. It places a bit of bit extra money into the fingers of parents who’ve jobs, which isn’t the core downside proper now. The core downside is that you simply have tens of hundreds of thousands of People who do not know the place the subsequent paycheck’s going to come from. So we have to have stimulus checks that go on to the American folks and 80% of People together with the huge majority of Republicans need money reduction. They acquired the $1,200 final time, they liked it. It helped preserve the — the groceries on the desk and pay that month’s lease. In order that’s the way in which economists need this subsequent stimulus to go. That is the way in which the American folks need the stimulus to go. That is the way in which Republican Senators even need the stimulus to go. And I hope that purpose will prevail and we’ll see money reduction be a big element, the central element of this subsequent reduction invoice. 

CAMEROTA: I imply, as you realize, Republicans are actually even inside their very own ranks scuffling with how a lot reduction and stimulus, et cetera, to give. It goes in opposition to their — you know, acknowledged philosophy that they’ve thrown out about being, you realize, deficit hawks and all that stuff. And so coming proper up is that $600 supplemental uninsurance cash that individuals have been getting. It may expire this month. And also you hear some Republicans saying that — that they’re — they do not wish to renew it, they’re uncomfortable with it as a result of was extra money than folks have been typically making after they had paychecks. So what is the response to that? 

YANG: Properly that’s the beauty of direct money reduction is that for those who put cash into folks’s fingers and it is unconditional, then in the event that they exit and get a shift or get some extra hours, then that’s extra money for them. And so there is no disincentive. However economists who’ve regarded at it say there are three issues that this invoice needs to be constructed round. Primary is direct money reduction to folks. Quantity two, advantages that assist individuals who do not have a job. So this can be a — a — one purpose why the payroll tax is a horrible thought. And quantity three, direct money to states as a result of proper now, many states across the nation are having big price range brief falls and the very last thing you want are extra layoffs within the midst of this pandemic. 



Source link

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *