Senate Republicans shun Home GOP bid to overturn the election
The failed Texas lawsuit backing Trump’s effort to remain in energy highlighted the completely different incentives dealing with GOP lawmakers.
Not a single GOP senator signed a “buddy of the courtroom” transient for the long-shot Texas lawsuit to throw out different states’ ends in a bid to maintain President Donald Trump in energy. And there was no coordinated effort to get Republicans on board, in response to interviews with greater than a half-dozen Republican senators earlier than the Supreme Court docket rejected the case Friday evening.
Chris Murphy’s shock flooring speech raises powerful questions for Democrats
If there’s one factor that widespread Republican support for President Trump’s effort to overturn the election outcomes suggests, it’s that we’re coming into into unsure and doubtlessly treacherous territory in relation to the long-term viability of our democracy.
And that raises laborious questions for Democrats that they haven’t critically begun to grapple with — about how they’ll cope with this ultra-radicalized Republican opposition, and relatedly, about how they need to talk with the American individuals concerning the true nature of that opposition.
All that is pushed house by a speech that Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) gave on the Senate flooring on Friday, wherein he referred to as out his Republican colleagues. Watch this full excerpt:
David A Graham/Atlantic:
The GOP Abandons Democracy
100 and 6 Republican members of Congress, and 18 state attorneys normal, are asking the Supreme Court docket to overturn the election.
As a substitute of Republican officeholders ready out Trump’s postelection tantrum, he’s ready them out, and slowly bringing the social gathering round to his facet. On this approach, Trump is ending his presidency simply the way in which he gained it: by appropriately recognizing what Republican voters need and giving it to them, and steadily forcing the social gathering’s purported leaders to observe alongside.
Jamelle Bouie/NY occasions:
The ‘Trump Received’ Farce Isn’t Humorous Anymore
Republicans are actually critically arguing that elections are reliable solely when their facet wins.
To inform a joke to a crowd is to be taught somewhat one thing concerning the individuals who giggle.
For our functions, the “joke” is President Trump’s ongoing struggle to overturn the election outcomes and maintain on to energy towards the desires of most People, together with these in sufficient states to equal excess of the 270 electoral votes required to win the White Home.
“#OVERTURN,” he said on Twitter this week, including in a separate post that “If someone cheated within the Election, which the Democrats did, why wouldn’t the Election be instantly overturned? How can a Nation be run like this?”
Sadly for Trump, and fortuitously for the nation, he has not been capable of bend actuality to his wishes.
Rush Limbaugh backtracked a reckless declare that a part of the nation was ‘trending towards secession’
‘I’m not advocating it, haven’t advocated, by no means have advocated it, and possibly wouldn’t,’ the radio present host mentioned after getting clobbered on-line.
Right here’s a narrative of Rush Limbaugh being Rush Limbaugh. That isn’t a praise.
Limbaugh made every kind of noise on his nationally-syndicated radio present this week about a part of the nation perhaps desirous to secede from the union. Then after getting clobbered on-line, he backtracked Thursday on his present, basically saying that’s not what he was advocating, nevertheless it’s what he had heard others say.
Once more, that is traditional Limbaugh: saying one thing provocative, one thing controversial, after which later claiming that’s not really what he was saying.
Editorial: Don’t simply deny Texas’ unique motion. Decimate it.
A easy five-page per curiam opinion genuinely may find yourself within the pantheon of all-time most vital rulings in American historical past. Each as soon as in an extended whereas, the courtroom wants to take a position a few of its amassed capital in issuing judgments that aren’t solely legally proper but additionally reply to imminent, tangible threats to the nation. That’s notably acceptable when, as right here, the courtroom finds itself getting used as a device to actively undermine religion in our democratic establishments — together with by the members of the courtroom’s bar on whom the justices rely to behave far more responsibly.